41. Which is the definition of 'not proved' in the Indian Evidence Act or BSA?
a. A fact is said not to be proved when it is not proved.
b. A fact is said not to be proved when it is not disproved.
c. A fact is said not to be proved when it is neither proved nor disproved.
d. None of the above.
42. What of the following is not included in expression 'Court' under the IEA or BSA?
a. All judges .
b. All persons legally authorised to take evidence.
c. All magistrates.
d. Arbitrator.
43. According to Section 3 of the IEA or BSA "Courts" do not include
a. Judges.
b. Magistrates.
c. Arbitrators.
d. Persons legally authorise to take evidence.
44. Under the law of evidence, the relevant fact
a. Must be logically relevant.
b. Must be legally relevant.
c. Must be legally and logically relevant.
d. Must be legally and logically relevant and admissible.
45. Whenever it is provided to the Indian Evidence Act that the court may presume a fact.
a. may call for proof of that fact.
b. the Court is bound to regard that fact as.proved
c. The parties can presume that fact as proved.
d. that fact is conclusive proof.
46. Under the IEA or BSA, a court has no discretion regarding proof of a fact in context of:
a. May presume
b. shall presume.
c. Conclusive proof.
d. Judicial Notice.
e. None of the above
47. The law of evidence under the IEA or BSA is
a. Substantive law.
b. Procedural law.
c. Substantive and Procedural law.
d. None.
48. Consider the following statements:
1. The proceedings of the parliament or State Legislature of India are judicially noticeable facts.
2. Rules of the road on land or at sea are not judicially noticeable facts.
3. Criminal law in force in India is judicially noticeable fact.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a. 1 only
b. 2 and 3
c. 1, 2 and
d.1 and 3
49. A will can be proved by at least one attesting witness being examined. Therefore where both the attesting witness have died, the will cannot be proved. Is this statement correct?
a. Yes, as this is the only way to prove the will.
b. No, both the attesting witnesses must depose.
c. No, it is not necessary to produce attesting witnesses when the Will is registered.
d. No, the signature of the attesting witnesses and the executants can be identified by the person acquainted with signatures of the attesting witnesses and the executants.
50. In a case of murder by A or B which facts are relevant.
a. that A left immediately the place of crime before police reached.
b. That A told his friends about taking revenge for his father's death.
c. That A was seen fleeing with a knife immdiately after murder of B
d. All of the above.
51. Indian Evidence Act or BSA - Extra Judicial confession means a confession means a confession made?
a. Before judicial Magistrate in court.
b. Before a doctor.
c. Before Friend.
d. Both before Doctor and before Friend.
52. Which one of the following statements is not true?
According to Section 5 of IEA or Section 3 of BSA, evidence may be given in any suit or proceeding of the
a. Existence of every fact in issue.
b. Non existence of every fact in issue.
c. Those facts declared relevant under the various provisions of the Evidence Act.
d. Those facts which the parties think are relevant.
53. Only such facts are made relevant by the Evidence Act as are encompassed by:
a. Section 5 to Section 55 of IEA.
b. Section 5 to Section 32 of IEA.
c. All the sections of the Evidence Act.
d. Only such facts which can be proved as per section 59 and 60 of the IEA.
54. The conduct of accused is relevant under
a. Section 8 of IEA or Section 6 of BSA.
b. Section 10 of IEA or Section 8 of BSA.
c. Section 11 of IEA or Section 9 of BSA.
d. Section 12 of IEA or Section 10 of BSA.
55. Which of the following Sections provides that evidence may be given of facts in issue?
a. Section 3 or Section 2 of BSA
b. Section 4 or Section 2 of BSA.
c. Section 5 or Section 3 of BSA
d. Section 6 or Section 4 of BSA.
56. Which one of the following sections of the IEA or BSA provides that evidence may be given of facts in issue and relevant facts?
a. Section 3 or Section 2 of BSA
b. Section 4 or Section 2 of BSA.
c. Section 5 or Section 3 of BSA.
d. Section 60 or Section 55 of BSA.
57. Which one of the following statements is correct?
Facts forming part of the same transaction are facts.
a. Which occured at the same time and place.
b. Which occured at a different time and place.
c. which are connected with other facts on the basis of time, place, parties, acts or omissions
d. None of the above.
58. The case of Sawal Das v. State of Bihar is related to -
a. Plea of Alibi
b. Rule of Res-gestae
c. Rule of estoppel
d. Rule of Res-judicata.
59. Provision of Section 6 of the Evidence Act or Section 4 of BSA relating to relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction, is based on doctrine of:
a. Res subjudice.
b. Estoppel.
c. Res gastea
d. Hearsay evidence.
60. Which of the following section of Indian Evidence Act or BSA prescribes conditions for making oral admissions as to the contents of documents as relevant?
a. 21
b. 22
c. 23
d. 24
e. None of the above.
CLICK HERE: PART IV
.jpeg)
0 Comments