192. A instigates B to kill C by means of a letter sent through post. The abetment by instigation is complete
a. as soon as the letter reaches the addressee.
b. as soon as the abettor posts the letter to the adressess
c. as soon as the contents of the letter are known to the addessee.
d. even if the letter was sent at a wrong address
193. A, a public servant is authorized by warrant from court of justice to apprehend Z. B. Knowing that fact and also that C is not Z, wilfuly represents to A that C is Z and thereby causes A to apprehend C. How does B abet?
a. By way of instigation.
b. By way of conspiracy.
c. By was of aiding
d. By way of supporting
194. What is the basic difference between an offence of abetment by conspiracy and the offence of criminal conspiracy?
a. In case of conspiracy, mere agreement is enough whereas in case of abetment by conspiracy an act should have taken place in pursuance of conspiracy.
b. There is no difference.
c. In case of conspiracy, an act should also have taken place, but in case of abetment by conspiracy, no act needs to have taken place.
d. In case of abetment by conspiracy, there need not be an agreement whereas in case of criminal conspiracy, agreement is essential.
195. For abetment by conspiracy:
a. a mere agreement between two or more persons to do an unlawful act is enough.
b. some act or illegal omission must take place in pursuance of an angagement between two or more persons to do an unlawful act.
c. There must be an international aid by one person to another for the doing of an offence.
d. one person must instigate the other for the commission of an offence.
196. Which one of the follwoing statements correctly defines abetment?
a. The principle accused must have the same intention as that of the abettor.
b. The liability of the abettor is dependent on the liability of the principle accused.
c. The abettor has aided the principle accused in commission of the offence.
d. The abettor has wilfully misrepresented a fact to someone and caused an offence committed by the later.
197. A instigates B to burn Z's house. B sets fire to the house and at the same time commits theft of property there. In such a case A would be
a. guilty of abetting the theft only.
b. guilty of abetting burning of the house but not guilty of abetting the theft.
c. guilty of abetting burning of the house and of abetting the theft.
d. not guilty of an offence as he himself did not commit any act.
198. Point out incorrect response.
The following are modes of abetment
a. Instigation
b. Engagement in conspiracy
c. Aiding
d. All of the above
199. The offence of 'abetment' is constituted by
a. aiding
b. Conspiring.
c. instigating.
d. All of the above
200. Which one of the following acts is not a mode of abetment under the IPC or BNS?
a. Instigation.
b. Aiding
c. Conspiracy.
d. An attempt
201. Abettor is a person
a. who commits the offence
b. who instigates the commission of offence
c. against whom the offence is committed.
d. who is innocent.
202. If a person instigates, intentionally aids or engages another person to do a thing he is said to have
a. Abetted such another person
b. Conspired with that person.
c. Becomes member of unlawful assembly
d. Designed commtssion of offence.
203. Consider the following statements:
(1) A wilfully by a misrepresentation misled a police officer to arrest B instead of C'.
(2) A instigates B to murder C, B refuses to do so.
(3) A instigates B to murder D, B stabs D. D survives from wound.
Which of the above constitute the offence of abetment?
a. 1, 2 and 3
b. 1 and 3 only
c. 2 and 3 only.
d. 1 and 2 only
204. The priciple of proximity of crime under criminal law is irrelevant, while deciding the liability for the offence of.
a. theft and dacoity.
b. culpable homicide and murder.
c. Kidnapping and abduction.
d. abatement and conspiracy
205. A instigates B to murder C. B refuses to do so. A is guilty of which one of the following?
a. Criminal conspiracy.
b. Abetment to attempt of murder.
c. Abetment to commit murder.
d. No offence.
206. Abetment is complete as soon as
a. The abettor has incited another to commit an offence.b. The person instigated has done some overt act towards the commission of the offence.
c. The offence abetted has been committed.
d. Both (b) and (c) above
207. A instigates B to murder C. However, B refuses to do so. The status of A is
a. A is guilty of abetting B by aiding.
b. A is guilty of abetting B by conspiracy.
c. A is guilty of abetting of B by instigation.
d. A is not guilty of abetting B.
208. X instigates Z to murder Y. Z stabbed Y but Y recovers from the wound
a. X is not guilty of abetment as desired result not obtained.
b. X is guilty of abetment to commit grievous hurt.
c. X is guilty of abetment to commit murder.
d. None of these.
209. The abetment of an abetment is an offence in IPC or BNS under
a. Section 107 or 45 of BNS
b. Section 108 or 46 of BNS
c. Section 109 or 47 of BNS
d. Section 110 or 48 of BNS
210.A instigated B to murder C who refuses to do so. A is guilty of
a. No offence
b. abetment to commit murder
c. criminal conspiracy.
d. Abetment to commit culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
211. Which one of the following statements is not correct?
a. Abetment of an abetment is not an offence.
b. Abetment of illegal omission may be an offence.
c. To constitute the offence of abetment the effect requisite to constitute the offence need not be caused.
d. The person abetted need not be capable by law of committing an offence
Part VII: CLICK HERE
.jpeg)
0 Comments